<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s new Dr Seuss look</title>
	<link>http://stewartgreenhill.com/blog/2008/06/18/googles-new-dr-seuss-look/</link>
	<description>Stewart Greenhill's random thoughts and musing</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://stewartgreenhill.com/blog/2008/06/18/googles-new-dr-seuss-look/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stewartgreenhill.com/blog/2008/06/18/googles-new-dr-seuss-look/#comment-527</guid>
		<description>If you believe the official statement &lt;a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/017268.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;(reported at Search Engine Roundtable)&lt;/a&gt; they're trying to re-brand themselves to appear more "playful". I guess if you have as much power as they do, it helps for people to see you as "nice guys" rather than a potential threat to civilisation as we know it.

&lt;blockquote&gt;"We recognized there was a need for a Google icon that would better work across multiple applications including web, mobile and client applications. We felt the small 'g' had many of the characteristics that best represent our brand: it's simple, playful, and unique."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm not sure they've achieved "unique" - after all, its just a blue "g". But in time I'm sure the association will come:

"Big G, little g, what begins with G?"

(hint: its not "googoo goggles", apologies to Dr Seuss)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe the official statement <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/017268.html" rel="nofollow">(reported at Search Engine Roundtable)</a> they&#8217;re trying to re-brand themselves to appear more &#8220;playful&#8221;. I guess if you have as much power as they do, it helps for people to see you as &#8220;nice guys&#8221; rather than a potential threat to civilisation as we know it.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We recognized there was a need for a Google icon that would better work across multiple applications including web, mobile and client applications. We felt the small &#8216;g&#8217; had many of the characteristics that best represent our brand: it&#8217;s simple, playful, and unique.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;ve achieved &#8220;unique&#8221; - after all, its just a blue &#8220;g&#8221;. But in time I&#8217;m sure the association will come:</p>
<p>&#8220;Big G, little g, what begins with G?&#8221;</p>
<p>(hint: its not &#8220;googoo goggles&#8221;, apologies to Dr Seuss)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myles Eftos</title>
		<link>http://stewartgreenhill.com/blog/2008/06/18/googles-new-dr-seuss-look/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Myles Eftos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stewartgreenhill.com/blog/2008/06/18/googles-new-dr-seuss-look/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>I absolutely hate it.

And it dilutes their branding. Maybe I'll get used to it, I don't know - but the old one was much more recognisable to those that don't see it as much is I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely hate it.</p>
<p>And it dilutes their branding. Maybe I&#8217;ll get used to it, I don&#8217;t know - but the old one was much more recognisable to those that don&#8217;t see it as much is I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
